Legal Opinion
Francis Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1982No. 5-73PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, Judge:
This dispute arises out of the unitized oil and gas operations in the Yates Field in Pecos and Crockett Counties, Texas. Francis Oil & Gas, Inc., and various individuals (hereinafter “appellees”) sought a declaratory judgment from the district court that *485the unit agreements governing the Yates Field Unit “did not effect a reallocation and cross-conveyance of the rights to and benefits of stripper well pricing and therefore left the rights to and benefits of stripper well pricing in the owner of the oil and gas rights in respect of the tract from which the oil is produced.” On…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mountain Fuel Supply Company, a Utah Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Reland Johnson, and Johnson Oil Company, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Sauder v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1981
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1978
- Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. New England Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Exxon Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
- United States v. Exxon Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Pennzoil Exploration & Production Co. v. LujanTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.