Legal Opinion
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of Energy
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided December 20, 1983No. Nos. 2-40, 6-31PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LACEY, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Department of Energy (“DOE”) and Naph-Sol Refining Co. (“Naph-Sol”) appeal from orders entered by, respectively, the District Court for the Northern District of New York and the District Court for the Western District of Michigan that, inter alia, invalidated the “deemed recovery rule” as procedurally defective. Mobil Oil Corp. v. DOE, 547 F.Supp. 1246 (N.D.N.Y.1982),1 is a declaratory judgment action brought to challenge the validity of a “three cent” retail price equalization rule and, alternatively, of the “deemed recovery rule.” *1480Naph-Sol Refining Co. v. Murphy…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Howard H. Gilbert, Jr. v. City of CambridgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- City Of Saint Paul, Alaska v. Donald EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Gas Pipe Line Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.