Legal Opinion

Baca v. Perez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1895No. 604PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, from a judgment for complainant, from the First Judicial District Court, Santa Fe County.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

ugisiation: ■ validity; con* su-uctibn of The regular session of the thirty-first legislative assembly of the territory of New Mexico passed joint resolution number 5, and the same was duly approved by the governor on the twenty-fourth day of January, 1895. This joint resolution provided for the employment, and pay out of the territorial treasury, of subordinate officers and employee» in and about the legislature, in addition to those provided for and paid under and by act of 'congress approved June 19, 1878. On January 25, 1895, the complainant, Celso Baca, filed his bill of complaint with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Edward's Lessee v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Clinton v. EnglebrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Slidell v. GrandjeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gomez v. CampbellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Drink, Inc. v. BabcockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Drink, Inc. v. BabcockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API