Legal Opinion
Knoll v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1999No. 97-3246PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
176 F.3d 359
John R. KNOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY and Lucent
Technologies, Inc., Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 97-3246, 97-3345.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued March 18, 1998.
Decided May 11, 1999.
Denise J. Knecht (argued and briefed), Daniel J. Nealon (briefed), Denise J. Knecht & Associates, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Ronald H. Isroff (argued and briefed), Kimberly B. Schroeder (briefed), Ulmer & Berne, Cleveland, OH, James M. Staulcup, Jr. (briefed), Lucent Technologies, Inc.,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Norris; Dissent.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Randall D. Carver v. Bobby Bunch and Betty BunchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Sam L. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Sheila L. Logan v. Dayton Hudson Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation Kellermeyer Building Services, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Compuware Corp. v. Moody's Investors Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Murray v. City of WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020