Sam L. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This case illustrates the dilemma confronting a district court when a plaintiff fails to comply with a court’s pre-trial orders. The court is faced with a Hobson’s choice: either it penalizes the plaintiff for the neglect or incompetence of his counsel, or it must overlook the non-compliance thereby rendering its order a nullity. Sam L. Carter appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action because his attorney failed to comply with the district court’s order. Carter contends that the district court dismissal was an abuse of discretion. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tyrone SILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Leonard L. Edsall v. Penn Central Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by337 opinions
- James M. Jourdan, Jr. v. John Jabe and L. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Tung-Hsiung Wu (Sean Tung-Xiung Wu) v. T.W. Wang, Inc. D/B/A World Journal USACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Randall D. Carver v. Bobby Bunch and Betty BunchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- John Carpenter v. City of FlintCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
332 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.