Legal Opinion

State v. Dalzell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1925No. 19089. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— The respondent was charged by information with the crime of perjury, based upon an affidavit previously made by him. After conviction, his motion for arrest of judgment was sustained, and the state has appealed.

Section 2183, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. C. § 9343], says:

“Judgment may be arrested on the motion of the defendant for the following causes. . . . (2) that the facts as stated in the indictment or information do not constitute a crime or misdemeanor.”

The respondent contends that, the information is fatally defective in the following respects: (1) in that ,it. failed to allege that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State v. FeamsterWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. KnizekWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. LedfordWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API