Legal Opinion
Clifton Hills Realty Co. v. Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 1938No. 5383PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
The Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County having sustained a general demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended petition, and the plaintiff not desiring to plead further, judgment was rendered against it.
This is an appeal on questions of law from that judgment.
The plaintiff-appellant seeks a declaratory judgment that a zoning ordinance of the city of Cincinnati is unconstitutional.
The defendants are the City of Cincinnati, Cliff M. Stegner, Commissioner of Buildings,» the Clifton Development Company, a corporation, Ring Construction Company, The New York Life Insurance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mutual Loan Co. v. MartellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Western Theological Seminary v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Offutt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Keller v. City of Council Bluffs, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Stoner McCray System v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.