Legal Opinion

Blackburn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 2000No. COA99-1408PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

On 3 May 1999, plaintiff filed this action seeking a declaratory judgment that the policy of automobile insurance issued by defendant provided underinsured motorists (UIM) coverage to plaintiff on 26 March 1998 because the purported UIM and uninsured (UM) selection/rejection form executed by plaintiff’s husband (Mr. Blackburn) was invalid.

Mr. Blackburn procured automobile insurance coverage with defendant on 15 August 1995, at which time he chose to “reject Combined [UM/UIM] Coverage and select [UM] Coverage” by executing a selection/rejection form. On 26 March 1998, plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Best v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Hendrickson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FortinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Sanders v. American Spirit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Lowe v. MurchisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance Exchange v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Stegenga v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Stegenga v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API