State v. Ratliff
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Audrey Ratliff, appeals from her conviction and sentence for theft, following a guilty plea. Ratliff offers three challenges to the amount of restitution the trial court ordered. Ratliff contends that the trial court erred in ordering restitution of $121,000, when she pleaded guilty to a theft of less than $100,000. She also contends that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to hold a hearing regarding the amount of restitution and in failing to consider her ability to pay.
{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court did consider Ratliffs ability…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. CliftonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. LalainOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LeGrantOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DunhamOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. WillisOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. TwittyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.