Legal Opinion

State v. Ratliff

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2011No. 10-CA-61PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Audrey Ratliff, appeals from her conviction and sentence for theft, following a guilty plea. Ratliff offers three challenges to the amount of restitution the trial court ordered. Ratliff contends that the trial court erred in ordering restitution of $121,000, when she pleaded guilty to a theft of less than $100,000. She also contends that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to hold a hearing regarding the amount of restitution and in failing to consider her ability to pay.

{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court did consider Ratliffs ability…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. CliftonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. LalainOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. LeGrantOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. DunhamOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. WillisOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. TwittyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API