Legal Opinion

State v. Lalain

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2013No. 2012-0302 and 2012-0408PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} Daniel Lalain appeals from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals affirming his conviction of a fifth-degree-felony theft offense, which included an order to pay $63,121 in restitution for costs Aero-Instruments incurred to investigate the theft and appraise the value of the stolen property. The appellate court also certified that its decision conflicts with State v. Ratliff, 194 Ohio App.3d 202, 2011-Ohio-2313, 955 N.E.2d 425 (2d Dist.), on the following question:

Whether, despite the defendant’s failure to object, it is error for the trial court to order a defendant to pay…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RatliffOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. LalainOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. State v. FarnsworthOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. YerkeyOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. OliverOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. DunhamOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API