State v. Boles
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Shawn R. Boles, appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a jury trial, for rape of a person under 13 years of age.
{¶ 2} Boles’s appellate counsel has filed a brief without the assignments of error required by App.R. 16(A)(2) but with ten “Issues” presented for our review. With respect to a number of those issues, counsel acknowledges, in some cases grudgingly, that the trial court did not err in ruling the way that it did. We agree with the state that it would be inappropriate for us to construe those issues as constituting implied assignments…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Wilms v. BlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by73 opinions
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. RatliffOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. MaustOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. PateOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.