Legal Opinion
Hallock v. Bonner
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided July 28, 2008No. 5:03-cv-00195PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In July 2002, plaintiffs Susan Hallock and Ferncliff Associates, Inc. (collectively “plaintiffs”) brought an action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted, on the basis of an exception to the Act’s waiver of sovereign immunity. Hallock v. United States, 253 F.Supp.2d 361 (N.D.N.Y.2003). While the suit was still pending, the plaintiffs brought the current action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sash v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Alcantara v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Kleehammer v. Monroe CountyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Raffaele v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017