Legal Opinion

Burlingame v. Consolidated Mines and Smelting Co., Ltd.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1986No. 52222-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

106 Wn.2d 328 (1986)

722 P.2d 67

RAY O. BURLINGAME, ET AL, Plaintiffs,

v.

CONSOLIDATED MINES AND SMELTING COMPANY, LTD., Appellant,

THE ESTATE OF HUGH D. BROWN, Respondent.

No. 52222-7.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 3, 1986.

Jan Elizabeth Brucker, for appellant.

Ernest L. Meyer, for respondent.

UTTER, J.

The court below vacated a judgment of contempt entered against Hugh D. Brown, a former president of Consolidated Mines and Smelting Co., Ltd., on the grounds that a show cause order did not provide adequate notice of the contempt proceedings. We reverse and hold the show cause order…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. State v. DictadoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Olympic Forest Products, Inc. v. Chaussee Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Emil Richard Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API