People v. Nolan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. Q. White, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
It being suspected that defendant, Nolan,was “blind-pigging,” one Baroni was employed by the sheriff of Mendocino County to purchase liquor from defendant, and succeeded in doing so. Defendant was thereupon charged, by indictment of the grand jury of the county of Mendocino, with the offense of keeping and conducting, in no-license territory, a place where alcoholic liquor was sold and distributed, and keeping and conducting, in no-license territory, a place where alcoholic liquors were kept for the purpose of sale and distribution.. He was thereupon duly tried and convicted of the offense…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
- People v. NolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- People v. McGarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. CavalliniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931