Legal Opinion

Early v. Forbes

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1935No. Civ. 9593PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs sought to recover damages for alleged breaches of certain covenants of a written lease. Among the defenses set up by defendant was that of cancellation of the lease by mutual agreement of the parties prior to the expiration of the term thereof. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury. At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant made a motion for nonsuit, which motion was granted. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of nonsuit.

The property was leased to defendant by plaintiffs’ predecessors in 1922 and the lease was to expire by limitation of time on March 31, 1932.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bering Mfg. Co. v. W. T. Carter & Bro.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Alabama Oil Pipe Line Co. v. the Sun Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Silva v. BairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Dyer Bros. G.W.I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Garrett v. DannerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Knowles v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API