Legal Opinion

Klein Et Ux. v. Weissberg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1934No. Appeals 155 and 156PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This is an action of! trespass to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiffs — husband and wife —while riding in defendant’s automobile, which collided with another car and a telegraph pole, as a result of defendant’s negligent driving.

As defendant offered no testimony, for the purposes of this appeal we must accept that offered by the plaintiffs as true. It may be briefly summarized as follows: Defendant, his wife, and three year old child, accompanied by the plaintiffs, were on a trip, in defendant’s Packard ear, from Tarentum, Pennsylvania, to Los Angeles,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mastel v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Fortney v. BreonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Baker v. IrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Wyatt v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Schoepp v. GeretySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eric McNello v. John B. Kelly, Inc. v. B. J. Lucarelli and Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Rodgers v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. DeAngelis v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Baumeister v. Baugh & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Calvey Motor Co. v. CoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API