Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Preis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1955No. Civ. 16897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Two of the beneficiaries of a testa- . mentary trust instituted a proceeding against the other beneficiaries, the contingent remaindermen, and the trustees, to modify the terms of the trust by removing certain investment limitations, including the deletion of the requirement that investments be limited to federal, state and municipal bonds, and other bonds (excluding those of foreign governments or municipalities) rated at least “AA” by Moody’s Investors Service, and to substitute therefor the power to invest in such notes, bonds, mortgages, trust deeds, debentures,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of FerrallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hamilton v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Tree v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Tree v. RivesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  5. Altemeier v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holt v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Stanton v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Sokol v. NattansCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Holt v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API