Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Armour & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1939No. 34,184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Plaintiff appeals from various adverse rulings on motions and demurrers directed against a series of petitions filed by him.

The record discloses that after each ruling now complained of, except on two demurrers to the last amended petition, plaintiff filed amended petitions, thereby acquiescing in the rulings of the trial court, and as to all of those rulings he cannot now complain. (See Harmon v. James, 146 Kan. 205, 69 P. 2d 690.) It is to be noted, however, that in their main aspects each of the petitions was substantially similar.

Summariz…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stoner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Harmon v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Fajans v. R. H. Macy & Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blazer v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. Rogers v. J. R. Oil & Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Hendricks v. Wichita Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Dwinnell v. Acacia Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Harold v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API