Legal Opinion

Dwinnell v. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1942No. 35,468PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

Plaintiff sought to recover on a life insurance policy. She appeals from orders sustaining motions to strike out parts of her second amended petition and to strike the remaining portion of the petition from the files. She also seeks review of orders sustaining motions to strike and demurrers to preceding petitions.

*465The alleged errors relating to the two preceding petitions may well be disposed of at the outset. The original petition was filed on December 5, 1939.' On April 27, 1940, the trial court sustained a motion to strike out certain…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Musgrave v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Harmon v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Waldner v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Cure v. Midland Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. West v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. PulliamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Sanik v. Shryock Realty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Fidelity Hail Insurance v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Smither v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Sherk, Administratrix v. SherkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API