Legal Opinion
United States v. Lambert
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 16, 2007No. 18-17103PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
Bernard J. Lambert appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 286, arising from his submission of, and payment for, invoices to the Fort Peck Indian Tribes Education Department (“Education Department”) for educational grant-writing services Lambert never performed. Specifically, Lambert challenges the district court’s application of a two-level enhancement under United States Sentencing Guideline (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2Bl.l(b)(8)(A) after it concluded that Lambert’s offense “involved ...…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Rodney Robert Kimbrew, A.K.A. Carlton CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. William Aramony, United States of America v. Thomas J. MerloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John G. Bennett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. StatenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. SchalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Ruslan KirilyukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. ReasorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.