Legal Opinion

Cline v. Carpenter

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1927No. Docket No. 4859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McLUCAS, J., pro tem.

This is an action for the recovery of commission for the sale of real estate, and is founded upon the following instrument:

“George Cline and Arthur Shell
“117 North Spadra, Fullerton, California.
“I hereby authorize you, as my exclusive agent, for a period of 30 days from date hereof, to sell or exchange the following described property, to-wit: 13 Acres located at cor Commonwealth & Nicholas Streets Price, $4500, per Acre Mortgage, $2500 Due-Interest 7%. Terms About % or little less. If you succeed in negotiating the sale of the above described property within the time…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Wright & Kimbrough v. DeweesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenfeld v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API