Legal Opinion

Walsh v. TATE

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1971No. Appeal, 187PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

In Lennox v. Clark, 372 Pa. 355, 93 A. 2d 834 (1953), this Court interpreted the 1951 City-County Consolidation Amendment of the Pennsylvania Constitution 1 and held, inter alia, that the office of the Register of Wills of Philadelphia was unaffected by the amendment and hence not subject to the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter. Today we are called upon to de cide whether the Register of Wills is now a city office subject to the Charter by virtue of certain 1968 amendments to the Pennsylvania Constitution. We hold that it is not.

The facts giving rise to this appeal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lennox v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Breslow v. Baldwin Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Szmahl's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Sebik's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Wiegand v. WiegandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Fraternal Order of Police v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1357 v. LeonardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Health v. HanesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API