Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Department of Health v. Hanes

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 2013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge PELLEGRINI.

Before the Court is the Department of Health’s (Department) Amended Application for Summary Relief pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 1532(b)1 (Application) for peremp*678tory judgment with respect to its Amended Petition for Review in the Nature of an Action in Mandamus (Petition). For the reasons that follow, we grant the Application and the mandamus relief sought in the Petition.

I

A

On June 26, 2018, in a case involving the marital exemption from the federal estate tax under Section 2056(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 2056(a), the United States Supreme…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Werner v. ZazycznySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. MathuesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. M. Morgalo v. S. Gorniak (SCI Albion Accountant) v. Montgomery County Clerk of CourtsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. A.D. Brown v. Prothy. J. Schury RankoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Com. v. Fegley, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. J. Begandy v. Clerk of Courts of Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API