Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. of Delaware v. McPhee & McGinnity Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 17, 1930No. 12,053PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

While the writ of error to a decree in a mechanics’ lien suit was in process of review by this court and undetermined in the case entitled Armour & Company v. M. & M. Co., 85 Colo. 262, 275 Pac. 12, the trial court caused to be filed in this court a statement in writing which led it to ask that the cause, in so far as it affected the claim of H. W. Yosmer, one of the parties to the suit and whose lien had been established, be remitted to the trial court for further investigation because of a showing that had been made with it indicating misconduct on the part of Vosmer, which caused the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pearce v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. The Sophia JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
  3. Armour & Co. v. McPhee & McGinnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Pinney v. FrenchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gamble v. Woodlea Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. POPE HEAT. & AIR CON. CO. v. Garrett-Bromfield Mtg. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API