Legal Opinion

State v. Haase

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1953No. 22928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, J:

This appeal comes to this Court on questions' of law from a judgment entered in the Police Court of the City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, finding the defendant guilty of a violation of §13044 GC. (Sec. 3773.34 R. C.) The defendant is a part owner of a hardware store located at 2078 S. Taylor Rd., and known as the Barr Hardware Store. On Apr. 5, 1953, which was Sunday, or the first day of the week, an officer of the police department of the City of Cleveland Heights, went to defendant’s hardware store and found it open for business with the defendant in charge. One of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CorologosSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. City of Topeka v. HempsteadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. WhittOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. State v. SteurerOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. South Euclid v. BondySouth Euclid Municipal Court · 1964
  5. South Euclid v. BondyCuyahoga County Municipal Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API