Legal Opinion

State v. Whitt

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1964No. 2795PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.

Defendant, appellant herein, was tried by the Municipal Court of Kettering without a jury and found guilty of permitting a building to be open for the transaction of business on Sunday, contrary to Section 3773.24, Revised Code, and fined $25 and costs.

On appeal to this court he assigns two errors: (1) the overruling of his demurrer to the complaint and of his motion to dismiss at the close of the evidence, and (2) the finding of guilty upon insufficient evidence.

The complaint reads as follows:

‘ ‘ Complaint

January 7, 1963

State of Ohio )

Montgomery County) ss

City of Kettering )

‘ ‘ The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HaaseOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. City of Euclid v. MacGillisOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. South Euclid v. BondyCuyahoga County Municipal Court · 1963
  4. State v. CarneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. State, Ex Rel. Richardson v. GormanOhio Court of Appeals · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roy L. Austin v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. State v. SabbahOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. BunyanOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. City of Lakewood v. CalanniLakewood Municipal Court · 2002
  5. City of Lakewood v. CalanniOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API