State v. Steurer
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.
These cases arise as appeals of a denial of motions by the trial judge, who was asked, in each case, to declare void a judgment of guilty, based upon the alleged grounds of the discriminatory enforcement of a criminal statute, and from the judgment rendered, in each case, on the plea of guilty entered on February 8, 1973.
We proceed to determine the issue, in each ease, as a final appealable order. No question as to the right of appeal is raised, or that the offense herein is malum prohibi turn and not malum in se. A violation of rights guaranteed by the Constitution is properly raised in this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Akron v. RagsdaleOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. GolzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Gallant v. Toledo Public SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. LampOhio Court of Appeals · 1977