Legal Opinion

State v. Steurer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1973No. 7166, 7167, 7168 and 7169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.

These cases arise as appeals of a denial of motions by the trial judge, who was asked, in each case, to declare void a judgment of guilty, based upon the alleged grounds of the discriminatory enforcement of a criminal statute, and from the judgment rendered, in each case, on the plea of guilty entered on February 8, 1973.

We proceed to determine the issue, in each ease, as a final appealable order. No question as to the right of appeal is raised, or that the offense herein is malum prohibi turn and not malum in se. A violation of rights guaranteed by the Constitution is properly raised in this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Akron v. RagsdaleOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. GolzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Gallant v. Toledo Public SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. LampOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API