Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Isaacs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 12, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Boyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*191Opinion op the Court by

William: Bogers Clay, Commissioner.

Affirming.

This is a personal injury action, in which plaintiff, Baseom Isaacs, was awarded damages against the defendants, the Chesapeake & Ohio Bailway Company and William Kinney, in the sum of $3,000.00. The defendants appeal.

The question whether or not plaintiff was a licensee was submitted to the jury. The only error relied on is the failure of the trial court to hold, as a matter of law, that plaintiff was a trespasser.

The facts are as follows: Plaintiff, a lad fifteen years of age, was employed by the Solvay Coke Company. On the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Warnock's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Willis' Administratrix v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Dawson's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Corder's Administrator v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Curd's Administratrix v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Vaughan's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. v. Smith's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API