Cool v. Fighter

April 1, 1924, plaintiffs sold defendant a radio receiver outfit, known as Radiola X. Its operation was not satisfactory to' defendant, and several attempts were made to better it, but with indifferent success. After attempting its use for several months, defendant disconnected it, refused to pay for it, and notified plaintiffs to come and get it. They sued him for the purchase price and repairs, and he gave notice, under a plea of the general issue,

“that it was an express understanding between the parties hereto that the Radiola X would give satisfactory results to the defendant and that it…