Legal Opinion

Routhier v. Sheriff, Clark County

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1977No. 9489PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

At the conclusion of a preliminary examination Donald Joseph Routhier was held to answer on one count of sale of a controlled substance, a felony under NRS 453.321 and 453.-161. He then filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus contending the charge must be dismissed because the magistrate denied the right to call and cross-examine a witness, as permitted by NRS 171.196(4). The district court denied habeas and in this appeal the same contention is reasserted.

During the preliminary examination the magistrate, upon defense counsel’s demand, directed a prosecution witness to…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. EssmanArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. William Andrew Washington v. Donald ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sheriff v. WitzenburgNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hyler v. SHERIFF, CLARK CTY.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sheriff of Washoe County v. VasileNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Rusling v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Sheriff v. WitzenburgNevada Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API