Routhier v. Sheriff, Clark County
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
At the conclusion of a preliminary examination Donald Joseph Routhier was held to answer on one count of sale of a controlled substance, a felony under NRS 453.321 and 453.-161. He then filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus contending the charge must be dismissed because the magistrate denied the right to call and cross-examine a witness, as permitted by NRS 171.196(4). The district court denied habeas and in this appeal the same contention is reasserted.
During the preliminary examination the magistrate, upon defense counsel’s demand, directed a prosecution witness to…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. EssmanArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- William Andrew Washington v. Donald ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
4Cited by6 opinions
- Sheriff v. WitzenburgNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Hyler v. SHERIFF, CLARK CTY.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Sheriff of Washoe County v. VasileNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Rusling v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Sheriff v. WitzenburgNevada Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.