Legal Opinion

Schwartzman v. Schoening

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 29, 1996No. 94-P-2089PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.

In question is the validity of a ninety-nine year lease by the defendant Schoening to his wife, the defendant Stuart, of parking spaces reserved to a unit formerly owned by Schoening and comprising part of a ten-unit residential condominium. The issue arises in the context of a declaratory action brought by the managers of the condominium, and the plaintiff Schwartzman, a subsequent owner of the unit. The *221defendants appeal from a summary judgment granted on the plaintiffs’ motion by a judge of the Superior Court who concluded the lease was invalid. We affirm.

The condominium, located at 70…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commercial Wharf East Condominium Ass'n v. Waterfront Parking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Noble v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  4. Kaplan v. BoudreauxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Tosney v. Chelmsford Village Condominium AssociationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Denardo v. StantonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  2. Levy v. ReardonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. McElligott v. LukesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  4. Johnson v. CohanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
  5. Blackstone Smithfield Corp. v. Town of BlackstoneMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API