Legal Opinion
State v. Bortz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 27, 1991No. 1 CA-CR 89-1305-PR, 1 CA-CR 89-1555-PRPublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
The significant issue in this case is whether Rule 32.9(a); Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires a second motion for rehearing when the trial court grants a prior motion for rehearing on a petition for post-conviction relief, grants an evidentiary hearing as a result of the first motion for rehearing, but then dismisses the petition on grounds other than those raised in the original motion for rehearing.
1990.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In April 1984 petitioner was charged by indictment with four dangerous felonies: aggravated assault, kidnapping, sexual…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. CarrigerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Daniel Cook v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- State v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Alavez v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Daniel Cook v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- James Albert Ashpole v. Justin Beresky, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.