Cosgrove v. Fisk
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
— The plaintiff, going by the name of Ida M. Carroll when a certain agreement, marked “Exhibit A,” to the amended complaint herein, was entered into, which affected certain of her rights and interests, brought this action against the defendant, Fisk, under her present name of Ida M. Cosgrove. The complaint was demurred to upon several grounds, and the demurrer sustained. Thereupon the plaintiff declined to amend the complaint, leave having been given her to do so; judgment was made and entered that she take nothing by her action, and that the same be dismissed. From that this appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watson v. Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Payne v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Pehrson v. hewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- White v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by2 opinions
- Batlle Viuda de Vilaró v. Torruella CostadaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1929
- Batlle de Vilaró v. Torruella CortadaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1929