Legal Opinion

Pehrson v. hewitt

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1889No. 12518PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal , from a judgment of the Superior Court of Shasta County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

—The plaintiffs bring this action to have certain judgments, and the executions issued thereon, and the levies made under them, vacated and set aside, that an adjudication in insolvency may be vacated and the proceedings dismissed, and for an injunction restraining certain defendants, etc., from selling certain property described in the complaint.

The defendants contend that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that therefore the judgment and order denying a new trial should be reversed. The defendants demurred to the complaint on the above-stated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kinder v. MacyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Harris v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sukeforth v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Albertoli v. BranhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Heller v. Dyerville Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Eaton v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cosgrove v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API