New Ætna Portland Cement Co. v. Hatt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of tire United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. Action at law by Edmurson Hatt, administrator of' the estate of William Lynn Hatt, deceased, against the New Ætna Portland Cement Company.
1Opinion of the Court
WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.
The administrator recovered judgment against the cement company for alleged negligence resulting *613in the death of his intestate. At the date of the death the company was maintaining a cement factory in Genesee county, Mich., and operating the factory both day and night. The portions of the factory which are important here were the coal room and kiln room. The deceased was in the employ of the company and worked at night in the coal room as an oiler. It is enough to say of the process of manufacture that a mixture of marl and clay, called “slush,” was pumped into…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Connors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Kreigh v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Rains v. RainsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.