Hauck v. Tidewater Pipe Line Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 49, Jan. T., 1893, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Schuylkill Co., May T., 1887, No. 21, on verdict for plaintiffs, Henry Hauck and wife, in right of- wife. Case for injuries to land, springs and fish pond.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 49, Jan. T., 1893, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Schuylkill Co., May T., 1887, No. 21, on verdict for plaintiffs, Henry Hauck and wife, in right of- wife. Case for injuries to land, springs and fish pond. At the trial before Pershing, P. J., it appeared that defendant, a limited partnership, without the right of eminent domain, constructed a pipe line for the transportation of oil from the oil region, and that at the time this suit was brought, March 7, 1887, the terminus of its line was at a point in Schuylkill county. At that point the oil was taken from the pipe and…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Paxson,
We will not consider the first three specifications of error, for the reason that they do not conform to the rules of court. We have made similar announcements so often within the last two or three years that it is difficult to understand why more attention is not paid to it.
The fifth specification alleges that the court below erred in declining to affirm the defendant’s fourth point. The point was as follows:
“ That the defendant is not liable for damages resulting from its business by reason of oil escaping from its own lands where *374it is being handled,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Pennsylvania R. v. MarchantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Robb v. Carnegie Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1891
- Pennsylvania R. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Pottstown Gas Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bowman v. HumphreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Summit Hotel Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Tidewater Oil Company v. George E. Jackson and Karl B. Jackson, Doing Business in Partnership as Jackson BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- District of Columbia v. TottenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
- Sussex Land & Live Stock Co. v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.