Legal Opinion

In Re: Stepan Company

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 25, 2017No. 2016-1811PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by

Circuit Judge MOORE.

Stepan Company (“Stepan”) appeals from a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-31 of U.S. Patent Application No. 12/456,567 (“the ’567 application”). For the reasons discussed below, we vacate and remand.

Background

The ’567 application is directed to herbicidal formulations containing glyphosate salt with a surfactant system.'Surfactants can enhance glyphosate’s effectiveness as' an herbicide by providing better adherence to leaves, thereby enhancing penetration. According to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  5. Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Osi Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  2. University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  3. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Adapt Pharma Operations v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  5. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API