Legal Opinion

Snedeker v. Snedeker

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 21, 2000No. 98-099PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, David Snedeker, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Brennan, J.) requiring him to pay the defendant, Arlene Snedeker, $192 per week in child support. He argues that the trial court erroneously calculated his child support obligation. We affirm.

The plaintiff and the defendant were married on April 24, 1993. The parties have two children. The plaintiff also has two children *20from a prior marriage for whom he is obligated to pay child support. In November 1997, the trial court issued a divorce and custody decree awarding the parties joint legal custody and the defendant primary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Giles v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Bohan v. RitzoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. Hamby v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. K & J Associates v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re CroweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. In Re Guardianship of E.L.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. In the Matter of BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Town of Nottingham v. BonserSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. State v. LeonardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API