Legal Opinion

Town of Nottingham v. Bonser

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 21, 2001No. 98-213PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.

The intervenors, Cedar Waters Village Partnership (1994), Terry L. Bonser and Mary L. Bonser, appeal a Superior Court (McHugh, J.) ruling that certain land owned by the partnership is subject to levy for the fines assessed against the defendants, Robert A. Bonser and Cedar Waters Village, Inc., in favor of the plaintiff, Town of Nottingham. We affirm.

I

The history leading up to the present dispute is lengthy, and many of the details can be found in Bonser v. Courtney, 124 N.H. 796 *420(1984), Town of Nottingham v. Bonser, 131 N.H. 120 (1988), and Knox Leasing v. Turner, 132 N.H. 68 (1989). We…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. MountjoySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. Clipper Affiliates, Inc. v. ChecovichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. White v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herman v. Monadnock PR-24 Training Council, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. In re Adam M.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. State v. Timothy BobolaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  4. Pedersen v. BrookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. Silverstein v. Town of AlexandriaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API