Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Baker

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 27, 2006No. 2005-380PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

The petitioner, Robert Winkler (father), appeals an order of the Superior Court {Sullivan, J.) granting the petition of the respondent, Nancy Baker (mother), for modification of child support. On appeal, the father argues that the trial court erred in failing to subtract his obligation to pay his adult child’s college education expenses from his gross income before calculating his support obligation for his minor child under the child support guidelines. We affirm.

The parties divorced in February 2002 and received joint legal custody of their two children. Permanent stipulations were signed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re WatterworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. Giles v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. In re CroweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. In re PlaistedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. In re BarrettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re CarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Vector Marketing Corp. v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. New Hampshire Ass'n of Counties v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. In Re LauraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API