Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. City of Ardmore
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2004No. 01-7154PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
Theodore Montgomery appears to have let his claims get away from him. He raises some eleven propositions, as nearly as we can tell, covering violations of procedural due process and various state tort claims. The defendants, unhelpfully unfamiliar with final order law, seek to challenge the preservation of Mr. Montgomery’s appeal. One of them, the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) seeks attorneys fees. With the exception of one of Mr. Montgomery’s claims, we affirm. As to the pretermination due process claim, we conclude that the City of Ardmore is not entitled to summary…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Cillo v. City of Greenwood VillageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Riggins v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Brammer-Hoelter v. Twin Peaks Charter AcademyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Robin Magee v. Trustees of Hamline UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Koessel v. Sublette County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.