Wilson Lockett v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The single question raised by appellant is the sufficiency of the evidence upon which he was found guilty by a jury of Counts One and Six (of an original eleven-count indictment of which nine counts charged appellant) of violation of the Internal Revenue Laws relating to non-tax paid liquor, and sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment for three years and one year for the respective violations. Count One charged possession of an unregistered distillery set up (Title 26, U.S.C., Secs. 5197(a) and 5601(a) (1)); Count Six charged possession of specified property (the component parts of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- James Henry Audett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Jack Wayne Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. De LarosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Robert Harry Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Jimmie O. Wooten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. De LarosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Hershel HollonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.