Jack Wayne Lyles v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Charged in a one count indictment with transporting in interstate commerce, in violation of Sec. 2314, Title-18 U.S.C., $22,000 in United States currency, knowing it had been stolen, defendant was convicted on evidence consisting in large part of the testimony of two women accomplices.
Appealing from the judgment and sentence, defendant is here, under five specifications of error, insisting in effect (1) that because, as he claims, there was no corroboration of the accomplice testimony, a judgment of acquittal should have been, and should be, directed, and (2) that, if not, the case was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- R. I. McClanahan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. BucurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Raymond E. McMillen Jr. v. United States of America, Douglas Gruchy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- J. W. Williamson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- J. W. Williamson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Odis Warren NolteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- John Roland Phelps v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.