United States v. Hershel Hollon

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma, Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

Defendant Hershel Hollon was tried by a jury and convicted of a violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5601(a) (1) for having “in his possession or custody, or under his control, any still or distilling apparatus…