Karen D. Peters, Cross-Appellants v. The City of Shreveport, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RANDALL, Circuit Judge:
I
The twenty-seven plaintiffs and intervenors in this case are currently or were formerly employed by the defendant City of Shreveport in the capacity of “police communications officer” (“PCO”). PCOs answer the city police department’s telephones, plot the changing positions of patrol cars on the department’s computer, and address citizen’s complaints to the nearest patrol car by means of a two-way radio. The plaintiffs, a group composed of twenty-four women and three physically handicapped men, alleged that the city discriminated against them on the basis of sex by…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jessica Lind Meeks v. Computer Associates International, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Grigoletti v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.