Ottesen v. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALLISON OTTESEN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07271-JST 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 HI-TECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Re: ECF No. 99 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Hi-Tech Pharmaceutical’s (“Hi-Tech”) motion to dismiss 14 Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. ECF No. 99. The Court will grant the motion in part and 15 deny it in part. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 Because the facts are well-known to the parties and the Court has summarized Plaintiffs’ 18 allegations…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.