Legal Opinion

Dillingham v. Parks

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1902No. 3,959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom Marshall Circuit Court; A. C. Capron, Judge. Action by Condie M. Parks against Glenn Dillingham and others upon a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellants, Harrison Dillingham, Bobert H. Dillingham, Glenn Dillingham, and others, were sued by Condie M. Parks, appellee, upon a promissory note and a mortgage on real estate given to secure payment of the note. The material facts on which the controlling questions arise were stated in a special finding substantially as fol*62lows: Harrison Dillingham, appellant, on September 4, 1894, made the note in suit to the St. Joseph County Savings Bank for $2,000, due in five years, with interest at seven per cent, per annum, payable annually, the interest to maturity being represented by five…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Small v. SlocumbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Thomas R. Wood & Co. v. Merchants' Saving, Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Prather v. ZulaufIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Hog Creek Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Kalman v. Treasure CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Farmers Savings Bank v. NeelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Kerbaugh v. NugentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. Seymour National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API