Kalman v. Treasure County

Plaintiff, as the owner and holder of interest coupons on a refunding bond issue of Treasure County, brought this action to recover the amount due thereon. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury, after issue joined by the filing of an answer and reply. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff and against the defendant county. A motion for a new trial was denied, and the defendants appealed from the judgment.

It is contended by defendants that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, for the reason that it fails to allege that the claim based…