Legal Opinion
Grumman Aerospace Corporation v. Wynne
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 17, 2007No. 2006-1482PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER. Opinion dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denied Grumman Aerospace Corporation’s (Grumman’s) superior knowledge claim against the United States Air Force (Air Force). In re Grumman Aerospace Corp., 03-1, B.C.A. (CCH) ¶ 32,203 (A.S.B.C.A. March 14, 2003), aff'd on recon., 03-2 B.C.A. (CCH) ¶ 32,289 (A.S.B.C.A. June 23, 2003). The Board also denied Grumman any damages under the jury verdict method on 14 of its sustained claims. In re Grumman Aerospace Corp., 06-1,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- James Giesler and Luke Coniglio (Doing Business as Central Park Company) v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- American Ship Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Elk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- The Boeing Company v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- The Ravens Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.