Legal Opinion

Clancy v. Daily News Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1938No. 31,316PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying a new trial after an adverse verdict.

The action is to recover damages for the publication of three libels. Plaintiff had served as councilman of the city of St. Paul from 1918 to June 1, 1930. In the preceding spring election he ran for mayor, and lost. From June 1, 1924, until June 1, 1930, he had been in charge of the department of public safety under the title of commissioner of public safety. He was an unsuccessful candi date for councilman in the 1932 spring election: He was a candidate for the same office in the election held April…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen v. Pioneer-Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Friedell v. Blakely Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Rigney v. W. R. Keesee & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Mallory v. Pioneer-Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. Thorson v. Albert Lea Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jadwin v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Rose v. KochSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Britton v. KoepSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API